Did you know ... | Search Documentation: |
![]() | Pack logtalk -- logtalk-3.81.0/manuals/_sources/refman/directives/coinductive_1.rst.txt |
.. This file is part of Logtalk https://logtalk.org/ SPDX-FileCopyrightText: 1998-2024 Paulo Moura <pmoura@logtalk.org> SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and limitations under the License.
.. rst-class:: align-right
directive
.. index:: pair: coinductive/1; Directive .. _directives_coinductive_1:
::
coinductive(Name/Arity)
coinductive((Name/Arity, ...))
coinductive([Name/Arity, ...])
coinductive(Name//Arity)
coinductive((Name//Arity, ...))
coinductive([Name//Arity, ...])
coinductive(Template)
coinductive((Template1, ...))
coinductive([Template1, ...])
This is an experimental directive, used for declaring
:term:`coinductive <coinductive predicate> predicates. Requires a
:term:
backend Prolog compiler` with minimal support for cyclic terms.
The current implementation of coinduction allows the generation of only
the basic cycles but all valid solutions should be recognized. Use a
predicate indicator or a non-terminal indicator as argument when all the
coinductive predicate arguments are relevant for coinductive success.
Use a template when only some coinductive predicate arguments (represented
by a "+
") should be considered when testing for coinductive success
(represent the arguments that should be disregarded by a "-
"). It's
possible to define local :ref:methods_coinductive_success_hook_1_2
predicates that are automatically called with the coinductive predicate
term resulting from a successful unification with an ancestor goal as
first argument. The second argument, when present, is the coinductive
hypothesis (i.e. the ancestor goal) used. These hook predicates can
provide an alternative to the use of tabling when defining some
coinductive predicates. There is no overhead when these hook predicates
are not defined.
This directive must precede any calls to the declared coinductive predicates.
::
coinductive(+predicate_indicator_term)
coinductive(+non_terminal_indicator_term)
coinductive(+coinductive_predicate_template_term)
::
:- coinductive(comember/2)
.
:- coinductive(ones_and_zeros//0)
.
:- coinductive(controller(+,+,+,-,-))
.
.. seealso::
:ref:methods_coinductive_success_hook_1_2
,
:ref:methods_predicate_property_2