debugger
ï
This tool provides the default Logtalk command-line debugger. Unlike Prolog systems, the Logtalk debugger is a regular application, using a public API. As a consequence, it must be explicitly loaded by the programmer, either manually at the top-level interpreter or automatically from a settings file.
API documentationï
This tool API documentation is available at:
Loadingï
This tool can be loaded using the query:
| ?- logtalk_load(debugger(loader)).
When the code to be debugged runs computationally expensive initializations, loading this tool after the code may have a noticeable impact in loading times.
Testingï
To test this tool, load the tester.lgt
file:
| ?- logtalk_load(debugger(tester)).
Usageï
Debugging Logtalk source code (with this debugger) requires compiling
source files using the debug(on)
compiler flag. For example:
| ?- logtalk_load(my_buggy_code, [debug(on)]).
In alternative, you may also turn on the debug
flag globally by
typing:
| ?- set_logtalk_flag(debug, on).
But note that loader files may override this flag setting (e.g. by using
debug(off)
or optimize(on)
options for loaded files). If thatâs
the case, you will need to either edit the loader files or write
customized loader files enabling debugging. For detailed information on
using the debugger, consult the debugging section of the User Manual:
../../manuals/userman/debugging.html
The debugger_messages.lgt
source file defines the default debugger
message translations.
The dump_trace.lgt
provides a simple solution for dumping a goal
trace to a file. For example:
| ?- dump_trace::start_redirect_to_file('trace.txt', some_goal),
dump_trace::stop_redirect_to_file.
A full trace can also be obtained at the top-level by using the S
(Skip) command at the call port for the top-levle goal when tracing it.
Alternative debugger toolsï
Logtalk provides basic support for the SWI-Prolog graphical tracer. The
required settings are described in the settings-sample.lgt
file.
Logtalk queries can be traced using this tool by using the
gtrace/0-1
predicates. For example:
| ?- gtrace(foo::bar).
or:
| ?- gtrace, foo::bar.
You can also use the gspy/1
predicate to spy a Logtalk predicate
specified as Entity::Functor/Arity
when using the graphical tracer.
When using this tool, internal Logtalk compiler/runtime predicates and
compiled predicates that resulted from the term-expansion mechanism may
be exposed in some cases. This issue is shared with Prolog code and
results from the non-availability of source code for the predicates
being traced.
Known issuesï
Clause breakpoints require a Prolog backend compiler that supports accessing read term starting line but only some backends (B-Prolog, GNU Prolog, JIProlog, XVM, SICStus Prolog, SWI-Prolog, Trealla Prolog, and YAP) provide accurate line numbers. As a workaround, you can check the start line number for an entity predicate definition using a query such as:
| ?- object_property(Entity, defines(Functor/Arity, Properties)).
and checking the returned line_count/1
property to find if thereâs
any offset to the source file number of the predicate clause that you
want to trace. This issue, if present, usually only affects the first
predicate clause.
Clause breakpoints are currently not available when using XSB as this backend doesnât provide line information.
Using the port command p
(print) requires a backend supporting the
user-defined portray/1
hook predicate called via the format/2-3
predicates ~p
control sequence.